Looking at network slowness, I noticed a lot of overrun errors and an inexplicable amount of broadcast traffic. Running a sniffer trace … these tuya bulbs announce themselves in a constant loop. We’ll add a network filter for now, but some other firmware on these bulbs would be great!
Category: Technology
Using polkit to allow non-priv user to restart service
As I work through automating certificate installation, most applications have a “service account” user that has write access to the SSL certificate files. However, that user does not generally have permission to restart the application service.
We could get the ID added to sudoers with specific rights to manage the service … but it seemed more straightforward to use Polkit for very granular control permitting the service account to run specific verbs with systemctl.
The following rule allows the “tomcatadmin” user to run systemctl start, stop, or restart with the apache-tomcat.service unit.
cat > /etc/polkit-1/rules.d/60-apache-tomcat-tomcatadmin.rules <<'EOF'
polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) {
if (action.id == "org.freedesktop.systemd1.manage-units") {
var unit = action.lookup("unit");
var verb = action.lookup("verb");
if (subject.user == "tomcatadmin" &&
unit == "apache-tomcat.service" &&
(verb == "start" || verb == "stop" || verb == "restart")) {
return polkit.Result.YES;
}
}
});
EOF
Vexing RDPSign Issue
With recent Windows updates, users now get a big message saying “Caution: Unknown remote connection” when launching RDP sessions from our CyberArk server. Easy enough – I have an internal CA, I can generate a code signing certificate, so I can sign these RDP files.
Except, in testing, I continually got an error indicating rdpsign cannot find the certificate. It’s there. I have a private key. It’s a code signing certificate. An hour or so later, I realize the “sha256” value is actually the SHA-1 thumbprint. Which … not my first guess and really more of a “out of reasonable options, start trying silly things” guess.
“$env:SystemRoot\System32\rdpsign.exe” /v /sha256 $hash256 $rdp
Voila, “All rdp file(s) have been successfully signed.”
Sigh — and, after all this work? I go from the red “unknown publisher” error to a yellow “yeah, you should think about this” banner.
Blender Script: Distance Between Two Points
We were having a lot of trouble using the measure tool in Blender — after discovering that you can hold the Ctrl key and “snap” your selection to a vertex, it actually worked in the way we wanted it to. But, before that discovery, my thought was to manually select two vertices and use a Python script to measure the distance between those points. That is “blender units” … and the metric or imperial units would be more meaningful. So I converted based on the scene configuration.
import bpy
import bmesh
def format_metric(meters: float) -> str:
a = abs(meters)
if a >= 1.0:
return f"{meters:.6f} m"
elif a >= 0.01:
return f"{meters * 100.0:.3f} cm"
else:
return f"{meters * 1000.0:.3f} mm"
def format_imperial(meters: float) -> str:
total_inches = meters / 0.0254
sign = "-" if total_inches < 0 else ""
total_inches = abs(total_inches)
feet = int(total_inches // 12)
inches = total_inches - (feet * 12)
if feet > 0:
return f"{sign}{feet} ft {inches:.3f} in"
else:
return f"{sign}{total_inches:.3f} in"
def measure_selected_vertices():
ctx = bpy.context
obj = ctx.edit_object
if obj is None or obj.type != 'MESH':
raise RuntimeError("Go into Edit Mode on a mesh and select exactly 2 vertices.")
bm = bmesh.from_edit_mesh(obj.data)
selected_verts = [v for v in bm.verts if v.select]
if len(selected_verts) != 2:
raise RuntimeError(f"Expected exactly 2 selected vertices, found {len(selected_verts)}.")
v1, v2 = selected_verts
# Convert local vertex coordinates to world-space coordinates
p1 = obj.matrix_world @ v1.co
p2 = obj.matrix_world @ v2.co
# Raw world-space distance in Blender units
raw_distance = (p2 - p1).length
scene = ctx.scene
units = scene.unit_settings
scale_length = units.scale_length if units.scale_length != 0 else 1.0
# Convert Blender units to meters according to the scene unit scale
distance_meters = raw_distance * scale_length
print("\n----- Vertex Distance -----")
print(f"Object: {obj.name}")
print(f"Raw distance (Blender units): {raw_distance:.6f}")
print(f"Scene unit system: {units.system}")
print(f"Scene unit scale: {scale_length}")
if units.system == 'METRIC':
print(f"Formatted distance: {format_metric(distance_meters)}")
elif units.system == 'IMPERIAL':
print(f"Formatted distance: {format_imperial(distance_meters)}")
else:
print("Formatted distance: Scene unit system is 'NONE'")
print(f"Interpreted using current unit scale: {format_metric(distance_meters)}")
measure_selected_vertices()
Signing PowerShell Scripts
A quick PowerShell script to report on its own signature data:
$scriptPath = $PSCommandPath
if (-not $scriptPath) {
throw 'This script must be run from a .ps1 file so $PSCommandPath is available.'
}
$sig = Get-AuthenticodeSignature -FilePath $scriptPath
Write-Host "Script path: $scriptPath`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
[PSCustomObject]@{
Status = $sig.Status
StatusMessage = $sig.StatusMessage
SignatureType = $sig.SignatureType
IsOSBinary = $sig.IsOSBinary
SignerSubject = $sig.SignerCertificate.Subject
SignerThumbprint = $sig.SignerCertificate.Thumbprint
SignerNotBefore = $sig.SignerCertificate.NotBefore
SignerNotAfter = $sig.SignerCertificate.NotAfter
TimeStamperSubject = $sig.TimeStamperCertificate.Subject
TimeStamperThumbprint = $sig.TimeStamperCertificate.Thumbprint
} | Format-List
To sign the script:
$thumb = '87E4C1F40D1DB8486F1E9093A76626AB1DFDEA30'
$scriptPath = "$env:USERPROFILE\git\CyberSecurity\misc\CheckPSSignature.ps1"
$cert = Get-ChildItem Cert:\CurrentUser\My, Cert:\LocalMachine\My |
Where-Object {
$_.Thumbprint -eq $thumb -and
$_.HasPrivateKey -and
($_.EnhancedKeyUsageList | Where-Object {
$_.ObjectId -eq '1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3' -or $_.FriendlyName -eq 'Code Signing'
})
} |
Select-Object -First 1
if (-not $cert) {
throw "Code signing certificate $thumb not found."
}
Set-AuthenticodeSignature -FilePath $scriptPath -Certificate $cert
Get-AuthenticodeSignature -FilePath $scriptPath | Format-List *
And now the script is signed:

Azure Key Vault Integration with Azure Pipelines
This document assumes:
Azure CLI is installed (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cli/azure/install-azure-cli-linux)
You already have an agent pool with online agent in a deployment pool

And, finally, that you have a pipeline deployment that uses a static keystore. We will be replacing that static keystore file with one obtained from the Azure Key Vault.
First, ensure the Azure DevOps service connection used by the pipeline has access to LJRVenafiTestKeyVault with at least:
- Secrets: Get, List
From the Azure command line, e.g.
az role assignment create –assignee-object-id 107d2d9a-4d1b-4d8b-9cd6-0f95587eb9ae –assignee-principal-type ServicePrincipal –role “Key Vault Secrets User” –scope “/subscriptions/dede429d-a340-4e90-8f76-05aa5280a1f5/resourceGroups/ljr-keyvault-demo/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/LJRVenafiTestKeyVault”

If you do not know which service connection is being used, update and run the pipeline. It will fail with a permission error, but the service connection’s usage history will reflect the release pipeline’s use:

Update your pipeline to retrieve the certificate from the Azure KeyVault. Add an Azure CLI task using an inline script

set -euo pipefail
PFX_FILE=”$AGENT_TEMPDIRECTORY/VenafiDeployedCertificate.pfx”
az keyvault secret download \
–vault-name LJRVenafiTestKeyVault \
–name VenafiDeployedCertificate \
–file “$PFX_FILE” \
–encoding base64
echo “Downloaded PFX to $PFX_FILE”
echo “##vso[task.setvariable variable=PFX_PATH]$PFX_FILE”
If you need a JKS file, add an additional bash task with an inline script

set -euo pipefail
JKS_FILE=”$AGENT_TEMPDIRECTORY/VenafiDeployedCertificate.jks”
# Verify keytool exists
command -v keytool >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo “keytool not found on agent”; exit 1; }
keytool -importkeystore \
-srckeystore “$(PFX_PATH)” \
-srcstoretype PKCS12 \
-srcstorepass “” \
-destkeystore “$JKS_FILE” \
-deststoretype JKS \
-deststorepass “$(JksPassword)” \
-destkeypass “$(JksPassword)” \
-noprompt
echo “Created JKS at $JKS_FILE”
echo “##vso[task.setvariable variable=JKS_PATH]$JKS_FILE”
Add a pipeline variable for the JKS Password – make sure to click the lock icon to protect the password

And, finally, add a bash task task to copy the JKS or PFX file to the proper place on the server

set -euo pipefail
# Copy JKS to location on server used in app config
TARGET_DIR=”/opt/credential-injection/certs”
TARGET_JKS=”$TARGET_DIR/VenafiDeployedCertificate.jks”
cp “$(JKS_PATH)” “$TARGET_JKS”
chmod 600 “$TARGET_JKS”
echo “JKS copied to $TARGET_JKS”
# Or copy pfx to location on server used in app config
TARGET_PFX=”$TARGET_DIR/VenafiDeployedCertificate.pfx”
cp “$(PFX_PATH)” “$TARGET_PFX”
chmod 600 “$TARGET_PFX”
Create a release to run the pipeline. Looking at the logs, you should see a confirmation that the pfx file was created

And, if you are creating a JKS file, a confirmation that it was created as well

You should also see the certificate file(s) on the server:

Time to Move Away from JKS Keystores
For many Java-based applications, Java KeyStore (JKS) has been the default for years. It’s familiar, widely used, and still supported. But “still supported” is not the same as “still the best choice.” If your application or platform supports it, now is a good time to move away from JKS and standardize on PKCS#12.
Why move away from JKS?
1. JKS is a proprietary format
JKS is Java-specific and tied to older Java conventions. By contrast, PKCS#12 is a standards-based format supported across platforms, tools, and vendors.
That difference matters operationally. Certificate and key material increasingly needs to work across Java applications, web servers, load balancers, cloud services, and automation tooling. PKCS#12 is far better suited to that multi-platform reality.
2. JKS has legacy security characteristics
JKS should not be considered a modern format for protecting private keys.
It uses non-standard, legacy protection mechanisms and has historically relied on weaker constructions than modern PKCS#12 implementations. As with any password-protected container, security depends heavily on password strength—but JKS offers less margin for error compared to more modern formats.
This becomes especially relevant if a keystore file is exposed. Offline password cracking is a realistic risk, and widely available tools can target JKS files—particularly when organizations use weak or reused passwords.
This does not mean existing JKS files are inherently compromised. It does mean JKS should no longer be the default when stronger, more widely supported alternatives exist.
3. Java itself moved on
The Java platform has already made this transition. Starting with Java 9, PKCS#12 became the default keystore type. JKS remains supported, but PKCS#12 is now the preferred standard in modern Java environments.
4. Many applications already support PKCS#12
In many environments, JKS persists simply because it’s what teams have always used—not because it’s required. Most modern Java frameworks, application servers, and tools support PKCS#12. For example, Tomcat has supported PKCS#12 since version 5.0, and current Java tooling handles it natively.
In practice, many applications can switch with little to no functional impact.
Why PKCS#12 is the better choice
PKCS#12 offers several clear advantages:
- Broad interoperability across platforms and vendors
- Better alignment with modern tooling and certificate automation
- Reduced reliance on Java-specific legacy formats
- Default support in current Java versions
What to do
If you manage Java applications or infrastructure, this is a good opportunity to review current keystore usage.
- Identify where JKS keystores are currently in use
- Verify whether those applications support PKCS#12
- Review vendor documentation for any requirements or constraints
- Update deployment standards to prefer PKCS#12 for new systems
- Gradually migrate existing JKS-based deployments where practical
For many use cases, converting is straightforward. For example:
keytool -importkeystore \
-srckeystore keystore.jks \
-destkeystore keystore.p12 \
-deststoretype PKCS12
Check vendor guidance
Before making changes, confirm support with the relevant application or platform vendor.
Key questions:
- Does the application support PKCS#12 for keys and certificates?
- Are there version-specific considerations?
- Are configuration changes required?
- Does the vendor recommend PKCS#12 for current deployments?
In most cases, the answer will be yes—but it’s still worth validating before making production changes.
Bottom line
JKS is not deprecated, but it is no longer the format organizations should be choosing by default.
It is a legacy, Java-specific keystore format with limited interoperability and older security characteristics. Meanwhile, PKCS#12 is standards-based, broadly supported, and the default in modern Java. If your application supports PKCS#12, prefer it. If you’re unsure, check—because in many cases, you can make the switch with minimal effort.
Choosing a modern keystore format is a small change that can meaningfully improve both security posture and operational flexibility.
Venafi Issue – Certs Immediately Revoked as Superseded When Using Stand-Alone Microsoft AD CS CA
Background:
Environment
- Dev environment, Venafi 25.3.0.2740
- Microsoft ADCS stand-alone CA
- Enrollment method: DCOM
- CA object uses a local account on the ADCS server
- No custom workflows
- No customizations
- No consumers/app installation tied to the cert object
- Simple certificate object created for testing
Problem
When a certificate is requested from Venafi against the stand-alone Microsoft CA, ADCS successfully issues the certificate, but the certificate is immediately revoked with revocation reason:
- Superseded
This is happening to the same certificate that was just issued, not a prior cert.
Expected behavior
Venafi should submit the CSR, obtain the issued certificate, and leave the newly issued certificate valid.
Actual behavior
Venafi submits the CSR, ADCS issues the certificate successfully, and then the same certificate is immediately revoked as Superseded.
Evidence gathered
1. ADCS database confirms issued cert is the same cert being revoked
Example request:
- Request ID: 41
- Requester Name: HOSTNAME\venafi
- Common Name: 20260331-withrevoke.example.com
- Serial Number: 55000000299749d000d299f5ae000100000029
- Disposition: Revoked
- Disposition Message: Revoked by HOSTNAME\venafi
- Revocation Reason: 0x4 — Superseded
This proves Venafi is revoking the cert it just obtained.
2. ADCS request contents are valid
For the same request, ADCS shows the CSR and issued certificate are normal and match expectations.
Request attributes
- CertificateTemplate: WebServer
- ccm: venafihost.servers.example.com
CSR / issued cert contents
- Subject: CN=20260331-withrevoke.example.com, O=”Example Company, Inc”, L=Temple Terrace, S=Florida,C=US
- SAN: DNS Name=20260331-withrevoke.example.com
- RSA 2048 key
- Certificate issued successfully before revoke
This suggests the CA is not returning malformed or obviously incorrect cert content.
3. Security event log confirms immediate issue then revoke
After enabling Certification Services auditing, Security log shows this sequence:
Event 4886
- Certificate Services received the request
Event 4887
- Certificate Services approved the request and issued the certificate
- Requester: HOSTNAME\venafi
- DCOM/RPC authentication path used
- Template shown as WebServer
Event 4870
- Certificate Services revoked the certificate
- Same serial number as the issued certificate
- Reason: 4 (Superseded)
This happens effectively immediately.
4. Pattern is repeatable
Querying the CA database for requests from HOSTNAME\venafi shows a repeated pattern where most requests are immediately revoked with:
- Disposition: Revoked
- Revocation Reason: Superseded
- Disposition Message: Revoked by HOSTNAME\venafi
The exceptions were tests where revoke capability had been intentionally removed from the Venafi CA account.
5. Permission test changed behavior but did not fix root cause
When Issue and Manage Certificates was removed from the Venafi CA account, the request no longer completed the revoke path and instead failed earlier with:
- PostCSR failed with error: CCertAdmin::SetCertificateExtension: Access is denied. 0x80070005
This indicates Venafi is performing CA administrative operations after CSR submission, and revocation happens later in that same general post-issuance path.
6. Procmon on the Venafi host shows VPlatform.exe using both CertRequest and CertAdmin
Procmon on CWWAPP1989D captured VPlatform.exe doing the following:
Cert enrollment path
VPlatform.exe queries and activates:
- HKCR\CLSID\{98AFF3F0-5524-11D0-8812-00A0C903B83C}
- CertRequest Class
- C:\Windows\System32\certcli.dll
CA admin path
VPlatform.exe then queries and activates:
- HKCR\CLSID\{37EABAF0-7FB6-11D0-8817-00A0C903B83C}
- CertAdmin Class
- %systemroot%\system32\certadm.dll
DCOM/RPC communication
Procmon also shows:
- endpoint mapper (135) traffic via svchost.exe
- VPlatform.exe connecting to the CA host on dynamic RPC port 50014
This strongly suggests:
- VPlatform.exe first issues via CertRequest
- then immediately performs CA admin operations via CertAdmin
Given the ADCS security logs, that admin path appears to be what revokes the newly issued cert.
Additional observations
Stand-alone CA
This is a stand-alone Microsoft CA, not enterprise template-based ADCS.
No special Venafi workflow/customization
This is a dev system with:
- no custom workflows
- no special consumers
- no installation/application integration
- minimal test object
That makes this look less like an environmental customization problem and more like:
- default Venafi behavior in this integration path, or
- a product defect in the stand-alone Microsoft CA DCOM path
Failed auth events also observed
We saw Security log 4625 failures from HOSTNAME for DOMAIN\USER
From the Security log:
- 11:53:34 — 4886 request received
- 11:53:36 — 4887 certificate issued
- 11:53:36 — 4870 certificate revoked
- 11:53:36 — multiple 4625 failures for DOMAIN\venafisystemuser
- 11:53:37 — another 4625
Since time resolution in the log is seconds, it is possible Venafi is requesting the cert under the configured credential (HOSTNAME\venafi), attempting to do something else under DOMAIN\venafisystemuser, getting an auth failure, and then revoking the certificate under the configured credential (DOMAIN\venafisystemuser). I would be surprised if this is the case because “superseded” is a very specific revocation reason. I would expect something like a generic “Unspecified” or “Cessation of Operation” to be used.
Summary conclusion
Current evidence indicates that:
- Venafi successfully enrolls the certificate from the stand-alone Microsoft CA using DCOM / CertRequest
- VPlatform.exe then immediately invokes the Microsoft CA admin COM interface (CertAdmin)
- the newly issued certificate is then revoked by the Venafi CA account with reason Superseded
At this point, this appears to be:
- Venafi-driven post-issuance behavior
- not spontaneous ADCS behavior
- and likely either:
- expected-but-unwanted default behavior in this integration mode, or
- a product defect in the stand-alone Microsoft CA DCOM workflow
Resolution
The issue was resolved by changing the policy module settings to set the cert request to pending instead of automatically issue. While I expected this to leave the cert in a pending state and require manual intervention (or a batch job to bulk approve whatever is pending), the cert was immediately issued.
Venafi TPP Installation Driver Ports
While Venafi documentation for each individual installation driver includes the port requirements, there was no single table view of the installation options and what port(s) are needed for that installation driver to work. Ended up putting together a table for our firewall rule discussion.
| Installation Type | Description | Default Port | Notes |
| Adaptable Installation Driver | Powershell | 22, 5985, 5986 | This is running a custom script |
| Amazon Web Services | 443 | To internet destination | |
| Apache HTTP | Uses ssh | 22 | |
| Azure Key Vault | 443 | To internet destination | |
| Citrix NetScaler | NITRO API | 443 | |
| F5 BigIP | iControl REST API | 443 | |
| Google Cloud Load Balancer | 443 | To internet destination | |
| IBM DataPower | DataPower Gateway | 5550, 5554 | |
| IBM Keystore | |||
| JKS | Uses ssh | 22 | Tomcat, Jboss, WebLogic |
| Oracle iPlanet Web Server | Uses ssh | 22 | |
| PEM | Uses ssh | 22 | |
| PKCS#12 | Uses ssh | 22 | |
| Windows CAPI & IIS | Uses WinRM | 5985, 5986 | |
Blender API: List All Items in a Collection
Instead of iterating through all objects, you can iterate through the items in a specific collection:
import bpy
# Name of the collection to inspect
collection_name = "TestCollection"
collection = bpy.data.collections.get(collection_name)
if collection is None:
print(f"Collection '{collection_name}' not found.")
else:
print(f"Objects in collection '{collection_name}':")
for obj in collection.objects:
print(f"- {obj.name}")
Printing to the console:

For this sample workspace that contains a torus and sphere with the default names



